Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【monster girl pussy sex video】The Google v. Uber lawsuit is confusing, until you watch 'Silicon Valley'

Google and monster girl pussy sex videoUber are set to duke it out in court, and the fight is far from simple. The good news is, though, that as art imitates life which then often imitates art, HBO's Silicon Valleycan help you understand this quarrel.

On Thursday, Alphabet (Google's parent company) announced that it's taking Uber to court over self-driving car technology that it claims a former employee stole to start another company, which Uber then bought because of the technology that person allegedly stole.

SEE ALSO: Inside Uber: Women either 'drink the Kool-aid' or suffer

Cases like this are confusing from the get-go, but all the moving parts make this one particularly hard to follow. Silicon Valleyisn't a perfect apples-to-apples comparison, but the major issues at hand are similar enough to provide some idea of what's actually going on here. At stake is technology that is key to self-driving cars, which Google, Uber and many other companies are betting on.

Just remember that, in the end, this all comes down to money.

The setup

In this case, Google is Hooli, which is basically how the show portrays Hooli anyways.

Inside of Google, there is Waymo, its self-driving car operation. Inside Hooli, there is nucleus, its attempt at developing advanced compression software.

At Waymo, there was an engineer named Anthony Levandowski, who helped develop important technology for Waymo. He was kind of a big deal there.

Levandowski then left to start Otto, a company that specialized in autonomous trucks. Uber acquired Otto for a price tag reported to be around $680 million. Google claims in the lawsuit that Uber bought Otto "after only six months of official existence."

In Silicon Valley, this situation roughly equates to the show's main character: Richard Hendricks. Refresher/spoiler: Hendricks leaves Hooli after having developed a compression algorithm that could change the game for the internet.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Hendricks then starts Pied Piper, which doesn't exactly have Otto-level success just yet, but is good enough to end up on the wrong end of a Hooli lawsuit.

How're we doing, Big Head?

The lawsuit

Yes, it's not a perfect comparison, but what Pied Piper goes through with Hooli is similar to what's going on between Google and Uber.

The basic accusation is the same — that technology was taken by a person who then started a new company

In Silicon Valley, Hooli accuses Hendricks of taking the algorithm that he had developed while working at Hooli to start Pied Piper. Because he sometimes used Hooli resources (he used his work laptop to test one tiny portion of his algorithm), he nearly loses the lawsuit. (He ends up winning on a technicality concerning his employment contract.)

That's essentially the same thing Google is saying Levandowski did, but on a much, much bigger scale, in starting Otto. In particular, Google is saying that Levandowski took Google resources, including more than 14,000 files, some of which contained "highly confidential" information.

There are differences, for sure. In Silicon Valley, Hendricks is the sole, brilliant mind behind the algorithm that much of the show's run has centered on — forcing Hooli to try to develop the same technology on its own. In the real world, Levandowski was just one of a team of engineers working on Waymo.

Check out the arbitration scene below. If the lawsuit goes to court, there's a good chance Levandowski will be forced to answer questions in the same way.

Back to reality

As much fun as it is to find GIFs and clips of Silicon Valleyall day, there is also a recent real-life case that mirrors Google vs. Uber.

In February, a jury ordered Facebook to pay $500 million in a case that included accusations that the founders of Oculus Rift stole trade secrets. Facebook and Oculus ended up avoiding the worst of the allegations, which sounds a lot like what Google is saying Levandowski did.

In the Oculus case, a company called Zenimax claimed that former employees of Id Software had taken code from Id that would later be used in the development of the software portion of the Oculus Rift virtual reality system. Zenmiax acquired Id Software, leading the company to pursue charges against Oculus and its owner, Facebook.

There are key differences, but the takeaway is the same. Patents and trade secrets are closely guarded in the tech world. And with companies constantly buying other companies — in many cases for that particular technology — these kinds of cases are actually relatively common, which is probably why Silicon Valleychose to tackle the subject.

Such is the competition to make the world a better place.


Featured Video For You
Apple's new 'Apple Park' spaceship campus will open in April

0.1188s , 12214.7421875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【monster girl pussy sex video】The Google v. Uber lawsuit is confusing, until you watch 'Silicon Valley',Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产激情艳情在线看视频 | 调教二区的影院xxxx精品中文字幕av人妻少妇一区二区 | 亚洲成人一区二区 | 99久久精品国产一区二区野战 | 国产精品一区二区不卡在线 | 日本一道本高清免费 | 99久久无色码中文字幕免费 | jk白丝自慰五月天综合网 | 久久久久夜色精品国产 | 久久精品国产亚洲v高清色欲 | 日韩欧美国产高清日日碰 | 日韩欧美第一区二区三区 | 伊人久久大香线蕉免费视频 | 国产精品原创视频一区二区 | 毛片久久 | 日韩在线女优天天干 | 成人精品电影推荐 | 国产丝袜不卡一区二区 | 欧美精品国产精品日韩电影 | 高清无码中文字幕影片 | 欧美日韩精品免费一区二区三区 | 91极品视频在线观看 | 欧美亚洲日本在线观看 | 国产精品精品国产 | a国产精品 | av夜夜躁狠狠躁日日躁 | 国产成人精品影视 | 国产精品一区二区高清在线 | 永久免费看MV网站入口亚洲 | 国产精品美女黄 | 成人区人妻精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲一区二区三区在线播放 | 97久久超碰成人精品网页 | 亚洲精品无码aⅴ中文字幕蜜桃 | 精品人妻无码视频中文字幕一 | 国产精品卡一卡2卡三卡网站 | 亚洲日本欧美综合在线一电视剧在线观看 | 亚洲无线看天堂av | 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠色综合久 | 久久久国产99久久国产首页 | 天天草天天操 |